Legal Opinion

Holm v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1954No. S. F. 18781PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

The petitioners seek a writ of prohibition to restrain the respondent court from enforcing its order for the inspection of certain documents in their possession. An alternative writ was issued.

The order was made in an action in which Wynona Bell, referred to as the plaintiff, seeks to recover damages from the *504petitioners Raymond Gnecco and the city and county of San Francisco for personal injuries alleged to have been suffered by her due to the alleged negligent operation by Gnecco, an employee of the city’s municipal railway, of a bus on which she was a passenger. The petitioners Dion R.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. McClatchy Newspapers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Superior Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Ex Parte ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Greyhound Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Sacramento Newspaper Guild, Local 92 v. Sacramento County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Roberts v. City of PalmdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Radiant Burners, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. American Gas Association, Peoples Gas Light and Coke CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963
  5. Oceanside Union School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API