Legal Opinion

State v. Kilker

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 10, 1987No. C1-86-778PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEDGWICK, Judge.

A jury found appellant, Janet Kilker, guilty of one count of second degree assault and acquitted her of a second count of second degree assault. The trial court stayed imposition of sentence and placed Kilker on probation with the conditions that she serve 360 days in the County Jail and restrict her place of residence. Kilker argues that the trial court committed reversible error when it admitted Spreigl evidence; that she was denied her constitutional right to confrontation; that the trial court’s additional instructions to the jury were improper and that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. DoughmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. State v. BillingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. State v. BurnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. State v. StaggSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. LinkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SkramstadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  2. State v. BuhlCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  3. State v. HoroshakCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. State v. DoughmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. State v. SkramstadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API