Legal Opinion

State v. Burns

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 17, 1986No. C3-85-2330PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

We granted the petition of the state for review of a 2-1 decision of the Court of Appeals reversing the conviction of defendant for sexually abusing his 2V2-year-old daughter and granting him a new trial. The Court of Appeals based the reversal on the fact that the trial court did not conduct a hearing before admitting the hearsay statements of the victim to her mother, to a social worker, and to the doctor who examined her. State v. Burns, 390 N.W.2d 819 (Minn.App.1986). The dissent argued that it was error to grant a new trial because defendant never requested a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. BillstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  2. State v. WillisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. State v. ForsmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. State v. DoughmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. State v. OrtleppSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. ShoopSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. State v. MitjansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. State v. LanamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. State v. KraushaarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  5. State v. DanaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API