State v. Burns
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
We granted the petition of the state for review of a 2-1 decision of the Court of Appeals reversing the conviction of defendant for sexually abusing his 2V2-year-old daughter and granting him a new trial. The Court of Appeals based the reversal on the fact that the trial court did not conduct a hearing before admitting the hearsay statements of the victim to her mother, to a social worker, and to the doctor who examined her. State v. Burns, 390 N.W.2d 819 (Minn.App.1986). The dissent argued that it was error to grant a new trial because defendant never requested a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. BillstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- State v. WillisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. ForsmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- State v. DoughmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. OrtleppSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. ShoopSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. MitjansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. LanamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. KraushaarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- State v. DanaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.