Legal Opinion

State v. Horoshak

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 24, 1987No. C6-87-480PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant Andrew “Nonny” Horoshak was convicted by jury of six counts of receiving stolen property, one count of theft by altering vehicle identification numbers and three counts of theft by possessing, buying or selling property with knowledge that vehicle identification numbers had been altered. Following his convictions and original sentencing, appellant also pleaded guilty to the additional felony of receiving stolen property in connection with a stolen.pickup truck.

Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence for one of the convictions of receiving stolen…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. State v. UlvinenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. State v. SchantzenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SchenkCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Horoshak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API