Legal Opinion

State v. Skramstad

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 27, 1988No. C1-88-378Published

1Opinion of the Court

433 N.W.2d 449 (1988)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,

v.

Walter Harold SKRAMSTAD, Appellant.

No. C1-88-378.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

December 27, 1988.

Review Denied March 13, 1989.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Robert A. Stanich, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, John E. Pearson, Becker County Atty., Detroit Lakes, for respondent.

C. Paul Jones, State Public Defender, Elizabeth B. Davies, Asst. Public Defender, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Considered and decided by HUSPENI, P.J., and SCHUMACHER and LESLIE, JJ.,[*] without oral argument.

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellant, Walter Harold…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. State v. PieschkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. State v. BettinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. State v. RainerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API