Legal Opinion

State v. Stagg

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 13, 1984No. C0-82-1217PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of a charge of intentionally aiding in the sale of an unregistered security, Minn.Stat. §§ 80A.08, 80A.22, 609.05, subd. 1 (1982). The trial court stayed imposition of sentence and placed defendant on 5 years’ probation, conditioned on defendant’s making restitution. On this appeal from judgment of conviction defendant raises issues of the sufficiency of the evidence to convict, the adequacy of the complaint, the propriety of admitting so-called Spreigl evidence, and the fairness of the prosecutor’s closing statement to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BillstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  2. State v. WaukazoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. State v. LehmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. State v. NessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. State v. JannettaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. State of Minnesota v. Jerry Expose, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  5. State v. CourtneyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API