Legal Opinion

State v. Buhl

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 9, 1994No. C0-94-106PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

In appellant Jonathan Edward Buhl’s trial for four counts of aggravated robbery, two counts of attempted criminal sexual conduct in the second degree, one count of assault in the second degree, four counts of kidnapping, and one count of motor vehicle theft, the trial court admitted evidence of a prior burglary conviction. The prosecutor submitted a certified copy of the prior conviction to the trial court, told the jury of the conviction without going into detail, and called no witnesses to testify regarding the facts of the prior conviction. Buhl did not object at trial…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. State v. FilippiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. State v. DeWaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  4. State v. SlowinskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. State v. NorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BolteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  2. State v. SebaskyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
  3. State v. HendricksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  4. State v. KeetonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API