Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Means

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided April 21, 1961No. 14,640PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

ROBERT E. QUINN, Chief Judge:

This is an appeal from a conviction by general court-martial on two specifications alleging, respectively, the use and possession of marijuana, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934. The accused contends the law officer erred to his prejudice in denying a motion for appropriate relief in regard to the use specification.

The specification alleges that the accused did “at Austin, Texas, and Berg-strom Air Force Base, Texas, from on or about 1 April 1959 to on or about 30 September 1959, wrongfully use…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Ebeling v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. United States v. SellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  5. United States v. MarkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. NeblockCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  2. United States v. AloyianUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  3. United States v. MaynazarianUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  4. United States v. CarterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  5. United States v. RathU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API