Legal Opinion
United States v. Neblock
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided September 30, 1996No. 94-5010; CMR No. 30419PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, Judge:
On November 10, 1992, Airman Neblock was tried1 by a general court-martial at Edwards Air Force Base, California, on one specification each of committing indecent acts and of committing indecent liberties (both with the same female under 16), in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934. In accordance with the pleas, the military judge found him guilty of these offenses with exceptions and substitutions as to the dates of both offenses. (Both specifications now state “on divers occasions between on or about March 1, 1992, and on or about…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Schmuck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ball v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- United States v. BarnerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
- United States v. LloydCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- United States v. PaxtonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
- United States v. HarwoodCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- United States v. ForresterCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2017
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.