Legal Opinion

United States v. Marker

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided May 19, 1952No. 281PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Paul W. Brosman, Judge:

Petitioner, a civilian employee of the Department of the Army, was convicted by general court-martial in Japan under three specifications alleging violations of Article of War 96, 10 USC § 1568. He was sentenced on May 25, 1951, to be confined at hard labor for 3 years. Army reviewing authorities have upheld the findings and sentence. We granted review for the purpose of considering substantial issues of law raised by petitioner.

John H. Marker, the accused, had been employed for a considerable period prior to the commission of the present offenses by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Ex Parte ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Dynes v. HooverSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
  4. Duncan v. KahanamokuSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. M & E Contractors, Inc. v. Kugler-Morris General Contractors, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. United States v. FoslerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2011
  2. United States v. DickensonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  3. United States v. SnyderUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  4. United States v. SadinskyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  5. United States v. FoutUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API