Legal Opinion

Bell v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 9, 1955No. 468PublishedCited by 1,244 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frankfurter

Once more it becomes necessary to determine “What Congress has made the allowable unit of prosecution,” United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp., 344 U. S. 218, 221, under a statute which does not explicitly give the answer. This recurring problem now arises under *82what is familiarly known as the Mann Act. The relevant provisions of the Act in its present form are:

“Whoever knowingly transports in interstate or foreign commerce . . . any woman or girl for the purpose of prostitution or debauchery, or for any other immoral purpose ....

“Shall be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Hoke & Economides v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Robinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  4. Bell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954

3Cited by1,244 opinions

  1. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Whalen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

1,239 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API