Legal Opinion

Asher Bros. General Illuminating Co. v. General Illuminating Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1937No. 26849. Department TwoPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

Plaintiff, as assignee of L. E. Asher and C. C. Asher, brought this action to recover compensation for services alleged to have been performed under an oral agreement, which was entered into “simultaneously” with a written agreement covering the same subject matter. The defendant interposed a demurrer to the complaint, which was overruled. Defendant then answered, denying the alleged oral agreement. Upon trial of the issues, defendant objected to the introduction of evidence of the alleged oral agreement, on the ground that it tended to vary and contradict the terms of the written contract.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hubenthal v. Spokane & Inland Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Anderson v. MitchellWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Union Machinery & Supply Co. v. DarnellWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Noel v. KesslerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  5. Thomson & Stacy Co. v. Evans, Coleman & EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Buyken v. ErtnerWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Hopkins v. BarlinWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Dopps v. AldermanWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. In Re LonerganWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Dennison v. HardenWashington Supreme Court · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API