Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Mitchell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1908No. 7590PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Sullivan, J., entered February 8, 1908, in favor of the plaintiff, after' a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action upon a promissory note.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

— Action by E. R. Anderson, plaintiff, against C. E. Mitchell, defendant, upon a promissory note. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals.

The note sued on was made by appellant in favor of the Fidelity National Bank of Spokane, Washington. After maturity of the note, it was transferred to respondent, who *266brought this action. The complaint is in the usual form. Appellant answered, admitting the execution of the note, and alleging as a further defense that the debt, loan or consideration for the note was due to the bank from the United States Marble Company, a corporation; that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bryan v. DuffWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Shuey v. AdairWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Allen v. ChambersWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Tacoma Mill Co. v. SherwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Hemrich v. WistWashington Supreme Court · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Bond v. WiegardtWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Skagit State Bank v. MoodyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Bradley Engineering & Manufacturing Co. v. HeyburnWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Pitt v. LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Forbes v. Fort Lauderdale Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1922

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API