Union Machinery & Supply Co. v. Darnell
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered November 10, 1914, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract.
1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.
Action upon an alleged promise of the defendant to pay to the plaintiff $1,000 on an indebtedness owing *227from John and George England, loggers, doing business as England Brothers, to the plaintiff. The material facts are as follows: In the year 1912, the England brothers were engaged in logging certain lands in Pierce county. To finance these operations, they borrowed from the defendant, Darnell, $4,000, evidenced by three promissory notes, one for $1,500, dated June 14, 1912, due one year after date, with interest at seven per cent, payable semiannually; one for $1,000, dated July 1, 1912,…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Kahn v. KahnTexas Supreme Court · 1900
- Moffitt v. . ManessSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Hubbard v. MarshallWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- Wodock v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Jackson v. Chicago, St. Paul & Kansas City RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Godefroy v. HuppWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Stover v. Winston Bros. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
- Cascade Timber Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1947
- Ryan v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Kinne v. LampsonWashington Supreme Court · 1961
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.