Legal Opinion

Hopkins v. Barlin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1948No. 30458PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

— Plaintiff brought suit for the return of a sum of money which he had previously paid to defendant for the execution and delivery by defendant to plaintiff of a written instrument wherein defendant had granted to plaintiff the right, during a specified period, to purchase certain business property belonging to defendant. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and, upon plaintiff’s refusal to plead further, the trial court entered judgment dismissing the action. Plaintiff appealed.

Our statement of the facts is necessarily based upon the allegations of the complaint. Respondent, Benjamin…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dutton v. ChristieWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. McGregor v. First Farmers-Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Tacoma & Eastern Lumber Co. v. Field & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Hockersmith v. FergusonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Thomson & Stacy Co. v. Evans, Coleman & EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Flower v. T.R.A. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  2. 224 Westlake, LLC v. Engstrom Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. Pardee v. JollyWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Snyder v. RobertsWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Pardee v. JollyWashington Supreme Court · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API