Legal Opinion

State v. L. D.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 29, 2011No. M090132; A143899PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Appellant seeks reversal of an order committing him to the custody of the Mental Health Division based on a finding that, because of a mental disorder, appellant was dangerous to himself and to others. ORS 426.005(1)(e)(A); ORS 426.130(l)(b)(C). Appellant contends that the state failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that he presented a danger to himself or to others. We agree and, accordingly, reverse.

Although appellant has asked us to exercise our discretion under ORS 19.415(3)(b) to review this case de novo, he did not provide any justification for doing so, and, based on the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. B. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. State v. AyalaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. State v. J. D. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. State v. B. P.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. S. R. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. M. A.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. L. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. State v. E.D.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. State v. T. W. W. (In re T. W. W.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API