Legal Opinion

State v. L. R.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 8, 2017No. 140362820; A156780PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEgan, J.

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment that ordered his involuntary commitment to the Oregon Health Authority for a period not to exceed 180 days, under ORS 426.130(1)(a)(C). Appellant contends that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that he was a danger to others because of a mental disorder. See ORS 426.130; former ORS 426.005(1)(e)(A) (2013), renumbered as ORS 426.005(1)(f)(A) (2015).1 We agree that the evidence in the record is not legally sufficient to conclude that appellant was a danger to others. Accordingly, we reverse.

When reviewing a challenge to a civil…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. D. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. State v. S. R. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. M. A.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. State v. WoolridgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. State v. D. L. W.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. E. J. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. State v. T. W. W. (In re T. W. W.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. State v. R. L. M.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. State v. J. G.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  5. State v. S.F. (In re S.F.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API