Legal Opinion

State v. E.D.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 2, 2014No. 113978; A150322PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORTEGA, R J.

Appellant challenges a judgment of involuntary civil commitment, arguing that the state did not meet its burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that, because of his mental illness, he is a danger to himself or others. ORS 426.130. We agree and, therefore, reverse.

We review whether the state presented sufficient evidence to support a civil commitment for legal error. State v. R. E., 248 Or App 481, 483, 273 P3d 341 (2012). We are bound by the trial court’s findings of fact that are supported by evidence in the record. State v. A. D. S., 258 Or App 44, 45, 308 P3d 365…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Department of Human Services v. N. P.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  3. State v. M. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. State v. D. L. W.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. State v. L. D.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. L. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. State v. M. J. F.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. State v. C. M. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. State v. J. T. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  5. State v. S.F. (In re S.F.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API