Legal Opinion

Huyck Corp. v. C. C. Mangum, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 6, 1983No. 524A82PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Justice.

This appeal involves the interpretation of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 136-29, which permits claims against the State of North Carolina for monies allegedly due pursuant to highway construction contracts. We must determine how this statute applies to third-party claims against the State in a negligence action against the third-party plaintiff, a highway construction contractor, when these third-party claims seek both indemnification from the State and payment of monies allegedly due the third-party plaintiff under the highway construction contract.

I

Plaintiff, Huyck Corporation, instituted…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Presnell v. PellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Teachy v. Coble Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Pinnix v. ToomeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Edwards v. HamillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. Jackson v. Central Torpedo Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Oberlin Capital, L.P. v. SlavinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Fabrikant v. Currituck CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Eli Research, Inc. v. United Communications Group, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
  4. Kiser v. KiserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Faircloth v. BeardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API