Huyck Corp. v. C. C. Mangum, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Justice.
This appeal involves the interpretation of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 136-29, which permits claims against the State of North Carolina for monies allegedly due pursuant to highway construction contracts. We must determine how this statute applies to third-party claims against the State in a negligence action against the third-party plaintiff, a highway construction contractor, when these third-party claims seek both indemnification from the State and payment of monies allegedly due the third-party plaintiff under the highway construction contract.
I
Plaintiff, Huyck Corporation, instituted…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Presnell v. PellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Teachy v. Coble Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Pinnix v. ToomeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Edwards v. HamillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Jackson v. Central Torpedo Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Oberlin Capital, L.P. v. SlavinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Fabrikant v. Currituck CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Eli Research, Inc. v. United Communications Group, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
- Kiser v. KiserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Faircloth v. BeardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.