Legal Opinion
Fabrikant v. Currituck County
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided October 18, 2005No. COA04-250PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GEER, Judge.
Plaintiffs, who own oceanfront property in Currituck County, brought suit against various defendants, including the State of North Carolina, the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (“DENR”), the Coastal Resources Commission, the Division of Coastal Management, and the Director of the Division of Coastal Management (collectively “the State defendants’-’). With respect to the State defendants, plaintiffs have sought (1) a declaratory judgment that they have exclusive ownership of the portion of the beach between the high tide mark and the vegetation line,…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe of IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. NaftalinSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lamb v. Wedgewood South Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Sharpe v. WorlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Roc Sansotta v. Town of Nags HeadCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Town of Nags Head v. Matthew ToloczkoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Wray v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
- Green Ex Rel. Crudup v. KearneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Can Am South, LLC v. State, North Carolina Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.