Legal Opinion

Faircloth v. Beard

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 28, 1987No. 682PA86PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

The Court of Appeals held that the denial of the defendants’ motion that the plaintiffs’ demand for a jury trial be invalidated is an interlocutory order which does not affect a substantial right. For this reason the appeal was dismissed by the Court of Appeals. The rule that there may be no appeal as of right pursuant to N.C.G.S. §§ 1-277 and 7A-27 from an interlocutory order unless such order deprives the appellant of a substantial right which he would lose absent a review prior to final determination has been stated in many cases. See Industries, Inc. v. Insurance Co., 296…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Oestreicher v. American National Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Tridyn Industries, Inc. v. American Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. In Re ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. North Carolina State Bar v. DuMontSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. J & B Slurry Seal Co. v. Mid-South Aviation, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Davidson v. Knauff Insurance Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Alford v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Kiser v. KiserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  5. State Ex Rel. Rhodes v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API