Legal Opinion

Trentham v. Moore

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1903PublishedCited by 22 opinions

FROM HAMBLEN. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Hamblen County.—G. McHenderson, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

This case was tried in the court below upon the following agreed state of facts:

“It is agreed: That, for a valuable consideration, the defendant did on the nineteenth day of November, 1901, execute and deliver to one T. P. Harmon, of Hamblen county, Tennessee, his certain promissory negotiable note for $37.50, due on the first day of October, 1902; the same being the note attached to the magistrate’s warrant in this case, and which is sued on in this action; that before the maturity of said note it was purchased from said T. P. Harmon by the plaintiff for the sum of $20, which was .paid in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blake v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  2. Railroad v. HarrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Kurth v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Nashville, etc., Turnpike Co. v. WhiteTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
  5. State v. SchlierTennessee Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. C. v. Floyd Fruit Co. v. Florida Citrus CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  2. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Ken Gardner Ford Sales, Inc. (In Re Ken Gardner Ford Sales, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1981
  3. Hooten v. CarsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Gilley v. HarrellTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Wilson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1919

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API