Legal Opinion

C. v. Floyd Fruit Co. v. Florida Citrus Commission

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 31, 1937PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.

The appeal brings for review an order denying injunction and dismissing the bill of complaint.

The bill of complaint was filed by the appellants and sought to enjoin the appellees, defendants in the court below, from collecting the so-called advertising tax on oranges, grapefruit and tangerines from the complainants, and from each of them, and from the complainants, or either of them, to place upon their fruit a stamp tax showing the payment of such advertising tax and from interfering with the complainants or their said fruit, or molesting them in any way in the handling thereof on account of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Sligh v. KirkwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Amos v. MathewsSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  4. Amos v. GunnSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
  5. Memphis Street Railway Co. v. ByrneTennessee Supreme Court · 1907

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Gaulden v. KirkSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  2. State v. Inter-American Center AuthoritySupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  3. O'NEILL v. BurnsSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
  4. Conner v. Joe Hatton, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1968
  5. State Ex Rel. Graham v. EnkingIdaho Supreme Court · 1938

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API