Legal Opinion
Wilson v. State
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided December 15, 1919PublishedCited by 19 opinions
FJttOM LINCOLN. Appeal from tbe ’Circuit Court of Lincoln County.— Hon. R. W. Smartt, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hall
The question involved in this case is the constitutionality of chapter 657 of the Private Acts of 1919, the title of which is as follows:
“An act entitled an act to provide revenue by assessing a privilege tax in counties of this State having a population of not less than 25,907 nor more than 25,909 under t ' ' the federal census of 1910, or any subsequent federal census, on carts, buggies, surreys, wagons, traction engines, automobiles and motorcycles, to further promote and provide for the building and maintaining of the public roads of said counties, and to provide the methods of collecting…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State ex rel. Astor v. Schlitz Brewing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1900
- State v. YardleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
- Cole Manufacturing Co. v. FallsTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
- State v. AlgoodTennessee Supreme Court · 1888
- Memphis Street Railway Co. v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- C. v. Floyd Fruit Co. v. Florida Citrus CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
- Foster & Creighton Co. v. GrahamTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
- Black & White Taxicab Co. v. Standard Oil Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1923
- State Ex Rel. v. CollierTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
- Co-Ordinated Transport, Inc. v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.