Kurth v. State
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM ROANE. ■ Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Roane County. S. A, Rogers, J.
1Opinion of the CourtLurton, J.
The appellant was indicted and convicted for selling spirituous or vinous liquors in less quantities than a quart without license. The facts are that appellant in 1886 sold wine manufactured by herself from grapes grown in this State —the product of her vineyard' — and that she sold in quantities less than a quart and without a license authorizing the sale of liquor as a retailer. It is insisted that, inasmuch as the wine was manufactured by herself and out of the produce of this State grown by herself, she was not required' by the law to take out license as. liquor dealer to make such sales…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Steven Waters v. Reagan Farr, Commissioner of Revenue for the State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- Railroad v. HarrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
- Chattanooga Plow Co. v. HaysTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
- Sims v. AhrensSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Hooten v. CarsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.