Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Zone v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1986No. 85-775PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrogan, J.

The issue before this court is whether Section 191 of the Charter of the city of Cleveland and Ordinance No. 2356-48 require municipal legislation that city employees in the building trades who are assigned to, and performed, foreman’s duties, though not formally ap*3pointed thereto, are entitled to the prevailing rate of pay for foreman established by negotiations between skilled building tradesmen and employers in the private sector. Section 191 of the charter provides:

“* * * The salary or compensation of all other officers and employees [other than unclassified] shall be fixed by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Alford v. Willoughby Civil Service CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State Ex Rel. Lynch v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  3. State ex rel. Pennington v. RossOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State ex rel. Brown v. East Cleveland Civil Service CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State ex rel. Pinzone v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Bardo v. City of LyndhurstOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State ex rel. Brenders v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State ex rel. Bush v. SpurlockOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State ex rel. Brenders v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Benson v. City of FairfieldOhio Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API