Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Brenders v. Hall
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 28, 1995No. 1994-0275PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 71 Ohio St.3d 632.] THE STATE EX REL. BRENDERS v. HALL ET AL. [Cite as State ex rel. Brenders v. Hall,
1995-Ohio-106.] Civil service—Promotional examination for police lieutenant—Action in quo warranto seeking appointment to position—Claim that examination was not "competitve" because one out of one hundred forty-five questions was improper—Court will not substitute its opinion for that of the municipal civil service commission, when. (No. 94-275—Submitted January 24, 1995—Decided March 29, 1995.) IN QUO WARRANTO. __________________…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
- Rock v. CabralOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Almassy v. Los Angeles County Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- State ex rel. Hanley v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- State ex rel. Paluf v. FeneliOhio Supreme Court · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Assn. of Cleveland Firefighters Local 93 I.A.F.F. v. ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Smith v. State Emp. Relations Bd., 08ap-759 (3-31-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009