Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Brown v. East Cleveland Civil Service Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1979No. 78-1486PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

It is well settled that in order for a writ of mandamus to be issued, the relator must show, inter alia, that he enjoys a clear legal right to the relief for which he prays. State, ex rel. Niles, v. Bernard (1978), 53 Ohio St. 2d 31, 33.

Appellee contends, and the Court of Appeals held, that he was a classified civil service employee, pursuant to E. C. 124.11(B), entitled to specific procedural rights and notices upon termination from employment which the East Cleveland Board of Education failed to provide.

E. C. 124.11(B) provides, in relevant part, that:

“The classified service shall comprise…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Alford v. Willoughby Civil Service CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State ex rel. City of Niles v. BernardOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State ex rel. Stough v. Bd. of Edn. of the Norton City School Dist.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State Ex Rel. Lynch v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Morgan v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State ex rel. Gibbons v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State ex rel. Pell v. City of WestlakeOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State ex rel. Zone v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Morgan v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API