Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Pinzone v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1973No. 72-570PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

0 ’Neill, 0, J.

Section 191 of the Charter of the city of Cleveland, in pertinent part, provides:

“The council shall by ordinance establish a schedule of compensation for officers and employes in the classified service, which schedule shall be in accordance with the prevailing rates of salary or compensation for such services, shall provide for like services, and shall provide minimum and maximum rates (which may be identical) of salary or compensation for each grade and classification of positions determined by the civil service commission under section 126 of this charter. For the guidance of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City & County of San Francisco v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Walker v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Sanders v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Fuldauer v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Municipal Construction Equipment Operators' Labor Council v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Princeton City School District v. Ohio State Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Zone v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API