Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Brenders v. Hall

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1995No. 94-275PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

Brenders asserts in his sole proposition of law that the office of lieutenant in the Brook Park Police Department is being unlawfully held by Hall, and should be rightfully held by him, because the promotional examination was not competitive.

“A person claiming to be entitled to a public office unlawfully held and exercised by another may bring an action therefor by himself or an attorney at law, upon giving security for costs.” R.C. 2733.06. A police officer of a municipal corporation is a public officer and occupies a public office. State ex rel. Mikus v. Hirbe (1965), 5 Ohio App.2d 307, 34…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Rock v. CabralOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Almassy v. Los Angeles County Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. State ex rel. Hanley v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State ex rel. Paluf v. FeneliOhio Supreme Court · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Herman v. KlopfleischOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Columbia Reserve Ltd. v. Lorain County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. EveretteOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State ex rel. Municipal Construction Equipment Operators' Labor Council v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State ex rel. Alben v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API