Legal Opinion

Arizona Together v. Brewer

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 2007No. CV-06-0277-AP/ELPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McGREGOR, Chief Justice.

¶ 1 The question presented is whether Proposition 107, a constitutional amendment proposed by voter initiative, complies with the separate amendment rule of Article 21, Section 1 of the Arizona Constitution. Proposition 107 would amend the constitution by adding a new Article 30 defining “marriage” and prohibiting the state and its political subdivisions from creating or recognizing a legal status for unmarried persons similar to that of marriage.2 The appellants, opponents of Proposition 107, brought this action pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.)…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Legislature v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People ex rel. Elder v. SoursSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903
  3. Kerby v. LuhrsArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Fine v. FirestoneSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  5. State ex rel. Hudd v. TimmeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McConkey v. Van HollenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Bentley v. Building Our FutureCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. McLaughlin v. BennettArizona Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Arizona Chamber of Commerce & Industry v. KileyArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Montana Ass'n of Counties v. State Ex Rel. FoxMontana Supreme Court · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API