Legislature v. Eu
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LUCAS, C. J.
In this proceeding, we consider constitutional challenges to an initiative measure adopted at the November 6, 1990, General Election. This measure, entitled by its framers as “The Political Reform Act of 1990,” was designated on the ballot as Proposition 140. Its stated purpose is to “restore a free and democratic system of fair elections, and to encourage qualified candidates to seek public office” by limiting “the powers of *500incumbency.” (Cal. Const., art. IV, § 1.5, added by Prop. 140.) The measure seeks to accomplish these goals by these three separate reforms:…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Edward J. DeBartolo Corp. v. Florida Gulf Coast Building & Construction Trades CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Cummings v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Clements v. FashingSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by198 opinions
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Robert L. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v. GuardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. BirkettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
193 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.