Arizona Chamber of Commerce & Industry v. Kiley
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
JUSTICE TIMMER,
opinion of the Court:
¶ 1 The Arizona electorate approved Proposition 206, “The Fair Wages and Healthy Families Act,” in the November 2016 election, thereby increasing the minimum wage and establishing earned paid sick leave. Petitioners ask us to declare that Proposition 206 violates the Arizona Constitution’s Revenue Source Rule, Separate Amendment Rule, and Single Subject Rule. We decline to do so, holding instead that Proposition 206 does not violate these provisions.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 The Arizona Constitution, article 4, part 1, section 1(2), empowers qualified electors to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Kerby v. LuhrsArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Jett v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Renck v. Superior Court of Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Whitman v. MooreArizona Supreme Court · 1942
- Bennett v. NapolitanoArizona Supreme Court · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Karen Fann v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2021
- Leach v. reagan/clean Energy for a Healthy ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2018
- Arrison v. Walmart IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023
- Hoppmann v. Pampered Pets & Plants IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
- LIVING UNITED v. STATECourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2026
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.