McLaughlin v. Bennett
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PELANDER, Justice.
¶ 1 The question presented is whether Proposition 108, a constitutional amendment referred to the people by the legislature, complies with the separate amendment rule of Article 21, Section 1 of the Arizona Constitution. The superior court concluded that Proposition 108 violates that rule. On August 3, 2010, we entered an order affirming the court’s judgment. This opinion explains our reasoning.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶ 2 Senate Concurrent Resolution (“SCR”) 1026 was introduced in early 2009, approved by both chambers of the legislature, and transmitted in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kerby v. LuhrsArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Slayton v. ShumwayArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- People Ex Rel. Deister v. . WintermuteNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- League of Ariz. Cities and Towns v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 2009
- Mathieu v. MahoneyArizona Supreme Court · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State ex rel. Loontjer v. GaleNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
- Rash v. Town of MammothCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Montana Ass'n of Counties v. State Ex Rel. FoxMontana Supreme Court · 2017
- Save Our Vote v. bennett/open Government Committee Supporting C-03-2012Arizona Supreme Court · 2013
- State ex rel. Darwin v. ArnettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.