Montana Ass'n of Counties v. State Ex Rel. Fox
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court 1
*185OPINION AND ORDER
2Opinion of the Court · McKINNONJustice McKINNON
¶1 Petitioners challenge the constitutionality of Constitutional Initiative 116 (CI-116), commonly known as Marsy’s Law, in an original petition for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief. The merits of CI-116 and the policy choices behind it are not at issue in this case. The only question before this Court is whether the procedure by which CI-116 was submitted to voters conformed to Montana’s constitutional requirements.
¶2 This Court has original jurisdiction over declaratory judgment actions “when urgency or emergency factors exist making litigation in the trial courts…
3Cases cited28 opinions
- Hunter v. EricksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Kerby v. LuhrsArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- State ex rel. Hay v. AldersonMontana Supreme Court · 1914
- Missourians to Protect the Initiative Process v. BluntSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- THOM & MILLER v. BARNETT/ELECTION CONTEST AS TO AMENDMENT ASouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
- League of Women Voters of PA v. Degraffenreid, V.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- Montana Ass'n of Counties v. State Ex Rel. FoxMontana Supreme Court · 2017
- Planned Parenthood v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2025
- Transparent Election Initiative v. KnudsenMontana Supreme Court · 2026