Legal Opinion

Cobb v. Cobb

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 4, 1986No. 8521DC483PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

Defendant assigns as error the court finding as fact that the attorney for plaintiff spent no less than 34.15 hours working on this case and that the value for these services was no less than $3000. Defendant contends that many items shown in the affidavit for attorney’s fees submitted by the attorney had no relation to this action, but included time spent on separate actions between plaintiff and defendant in California and South Carolina.

The trial court’s findings of fact are conclusive if supported by any competent evidence. Little v. Little, 9 N.C. App. 361, 365, 176 S.E.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Coble v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Hudson v. HudsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Austin v. AustinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Falls v. FallsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  2. Lamb v. LambCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  3. McKinney v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  4. Van Every v. McGuireCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  5. Almason v. AlmasonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API