Legal Opinion

McKinney v. McKinney

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 16, 2013No. COA12-1152PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELMAN, Judge.

Where our prior opinion directed the trial court to award fees for the time that an expert witness actually spent testifying in court, but not for time spent preparing for trial, the trial court erred in awarding additional *301fees based upon the time that the expert spent waiting in court. The trial court did not err in awarding attorney’s fees to plaintiff for the first appeal in a case involving child support and custody.

I.Factual and Procedural Background

The underlying facts of this case can be found in our previous decision on this matter, McKinney v. McKinney,_N.C. App._,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Koufman v. KoufmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Whedon v. WhedonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Lea Company v. Narth Carolina Bd. of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  4. Friend-Novorska v. NovorskaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. Hill v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Foreclosure of CornblumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  2. Wheeler v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API