Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Taylor

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 4, 1996No. 191A95PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRYE, Justice.

The sole question on this appeal is whether a trial court, in ruling on a motion for attorney’s fees in a child custody and support action, may determine that a party has sufficient means to defray the cost of the action without considering the estate of the other party. We answer in the affirmative and reverse the Court of Appeals’ decision to the contrary.

The following facts and circumstances are pertinent to this appeal. John Anderson Taylor, Jr. (plaintiff) and Dulcia G. Taylor (defendant) were married on 30 December 1981 and separated on or about 7 May 1990. Two children…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Derebery v. Pitt County Fire MarshallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Hudson v. HudsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Rickert v. RickertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Cobb v. CobbCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. State v. AnthonySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Craig v. County of ChathamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Zaliagiris v. ZaliagirisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. In Re the Marriage of BrandSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API