Legal Opinion

Morgan v. New Sweden Irrigation District

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 2014No. 39624PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Chief Justice.

This ease arose after New Sweden Irrigation District (“New Sweden”) mowed the canal banks on Bradley Morgan’s property. Morgan claimed New Sweden negligently damaged his property. New Sweden counterclaimed for a declaratory judgment as to its easement’s existence and scope, and then moved for summary judgment. The Bonneville County district court granted partial summary judgment, holding that New Sweden’s easement was sixteen feet wide and New Sweden was not liable for damaged items within its easement. The district court denied summary judgment as to Morgan’s claim for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Tiffany Ann Marie Fragnella v. Robert B. Petrovich, Jr.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Kolln v. Saint Luke's Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  3. City of Osburn v. RandelIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District v. Washington Federal SavingsIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Bettwieser v. New York Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Morgan v. New Sweden Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Hood V. PoormanIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Chester v. Wild Idaho Adventures RV Park, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Galvin v. City of MiddletonIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Day v. Idaho Transportation DeptIdaho Supreme Court · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API