City of Osburn v. Randel
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
J. JONES, Justice.
David and Pamela Randel appeal the denial of their request for attorney fees under I.C. § 12-117, following the dismissal of a zoning enforcement action brought against them by the City of Osburn (City). The district court found the Randels to be the prevailing party but held they were not entitled to a fee award because the City had not pursued the action frivolously or without foundation. The Randels appeal to this Court and we affirm.
I
BACKGROUND
On August 14, 2007, the City’s attorney wrote to the Randels to notify them they were in violation of City zoning ordinances. The…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Taylor v. McNicholsIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Payette River Property Owners Ass'n v. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Potlatch Education Ass'n v. Potlatch School District No. 285Idaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Rincover v. State, Department of FinanceIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Eacret v. Bonner CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Friends of Minidoka v. Jerome CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- Syringa Networks, LLC v. Idaho Department of AdministrationIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
- Gaylen Clayson v. Don ZebeIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- Hobson Fabricating Corp. v. SE/Z Construction, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
- Idahoans for Open Primaries v. LabradorIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.