Legal Opinion

City of Osburn v. Randel

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 2012No. 37965PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. JONES, Justice.

David and Pamela Randel appeal the denial of their request for attorney fees under I.C. § 12-117, following the dismissal of a zoning enforcement action brought against them by the City of Osburn (City). The district court found the Randels to be the prevailing party but held they were not entitled to a fee award because the City had not pursued the action frivolously or without foundation. The Randels appeal to this Court and we affirm.

I

BACKGROUND

On August 14, 2007, the City’s attorney wrote to the Randels to notify them they were in violation of City zoning ordinances. The…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Taylor v. McNicholsIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Payette River Property Owners Ass'n v. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Potlatch Education Ass'n v. Potlatch School District No. 285Idaho Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Rincover v. State, Department of FinanceIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Eacret v. Bonner CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Friends of Minidoka v. Jerome CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Syringa Networks, LLC v. Idaho Department of AdministrationIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Gaylen Clayson v. Don ZebeIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Hobson Fabricating Corp. v. SE/Z Construction, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Idahoans for Open Primaries v. LabradorIdaho Supreme Court · 2023

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API