Legal Opinion

Morgan v. New Sweden Irrigation District

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 2016No. 42575PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. JONES, Justice.

I. Nature of the Case

Appellant, Bradley K. Morgan (“Morgan”), appeals from a declaratory judgment determining where to measure the sixteen-foot width of an easement held by Respondent, New Sweden Irrigation District (“New Sweden”), which borders an irrigation canal (the “Sinkhole Irrigation Canal”) that runs the length of a piece of Morgan’s property (the “Morgan Property”). On appeal, Morgan does not dispute the existence of New Sweden’s easement, but rather argues that: (1) the district court erred by denying Morgan’s request for a jury trial; (2) the district court abused…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Idaho First National Bank v. Bliss Valley Foods, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Ada County Highway District v. Total Success Investment, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Borah v. McCandlessIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Rudd v. RuddIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Meisner v. Potlatch Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Papin v. PapinIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Hood V. PoormanIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Seward v. Musick Auction, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  4. N. Idaho Bldg. Contractors Ass'n v. City of HaydenIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Thornton v. PandreaIdaho Supreme Court · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API