Legal Opinion

Galvin v. City of Middleton

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 2019No. Docket No. 45578PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Justice.

The City of Middleton (the City) appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment to Martin and Patricia Galvin on their claim of prescriptive easement and its award of attorney fees to the Galvins pursuant to Idaho Code section 12-117. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On June 28, 2016, the Galvins filed a complaint against the City of Middleton for quiet title, declaratory judgment, and a permanent injunction concerning their use of Willis Road, a private road that the City acquired in 2015. The Galvins alleged that their use of Willis Road since 1949…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lunneborg v. My Fun Life, Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Joyce v. Murphy Land & Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Michalk v. MichalkIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Smith v. MittonIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
  5. P.O. Ventures, Inc. v. Loucks Family Irrevocable TrustIdaho Supreme Court · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Erickson v. EricksonIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Millard v. TalburtIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
  3. Asher v. McMillanIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Fitzpatrick v. KentIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Reese v. City of BlackfootIdaho Supreme Court · 2023

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API