Legal Opinion

Bettwieser v. New York Irrigation District

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 2013No. 37396PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Justice.

Martin Bettwieser, a pro se plaintiff, brought a breach of contract action against the New York Irrigation District and its directors (collectively, the District). Bettwieser alleged that the District breached an oral contract by not timely providing him with a legal opinion regarding whether he could be excluded from the irrigation district without paying statutory exclusion and filing fees. Following a bench trial, the district court issued findings of fact and conclusions of law, ruling that Bettwieser had failed to demonstrate that he was entitled to relief. Bettwieser…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Bach v. BagleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Perry v. Magic Valley Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Michalk v. MichalkIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Potlatch Education Ass'n v. Potlatch School District No. 285Idaho Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. RhoadesIdaho Supreme Court · 1991

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Zeyen v. Pocatello/Chubbuck School Dist 25Idaho Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Guzman v. Piercy / Canyon County / SuttonIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. Michael Eugene KochIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Dea Haight v. Idaho Dept of TransportationIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Jim & Maryann Plane Family Trust v. SkinnerIdaho Supreme Court · 2015

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API