Legal Opinion

Gray v. Badger Mining Corp.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 18, 2004No. C4-02-2052PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HANSON, Justice.

This appeal focuses on the district court’s denial of a motion for summary judgment brought by a supplier of silica to dismiss the products liability claim of an injured foundry worker. The issue is whether the raw materials supplier, respondent Badger Mining Corp. (Badger Mining), breached a duty to warn the worker, appellant Lawrence B. Gray (Gray), of hazards associated with the use of silica in foundry processes. The court of appeals reversed the district court, holding that because Gray’s employer, Smith Foundry, was a sophisticated purchaser and Badger Mining was…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  2. Beale v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  3. Sheila Ritchie v. Glidden Company, Ici Paints World-Group and Graco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  4. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  5. Claude Cimino v. Raymark Industries, Inc., Pittsburgh Corning Corporation and Asbestos Corporation LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. PLIVA, Inc. v. MensingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Taylor v. American Chemistry CouncilCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  3. Humble Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. GomezTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Riley v. Cordis Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
  5. Domagala v. RollandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API