Legal Opinion

Vagim v. Brown

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 27, 1944No. Civ. 3117PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

Plaintiff prosecuted this action against defendant to recover damages because of defendant’s failure to deliver raisins to plaintiff under a written contract. Plaintiff recovered judgment and defendant appealed.

The appeal is based upon two grounds: (1) that plaintiff was doing business under a fictitious name without compliance with the terms of the statute; and (2) that the contract itself was unlawful and void and known by plaintiff to be unlawful at the time the contract was signed by the plaintiff, and for that reason cannot be enforced.

Plaintiff alleged in the complaint that he “was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lindemann v. San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Estate of YoellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Whitechat v. GuyetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Burne v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Teachout v. BogyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Freeman v. JerginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Thacker v. American FoundryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. West Covina Enterprises, Inc. v. ChalmersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Eaton v. BrockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Levelon Builders, Inc. v. LynnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API