Legal Opinion

Estate of Yoell

California Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1913No. S.F. 6201PublishedCited by 51 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco awarding a surviving wife a family allowance from the estate of her deceased husband. Thomas F. Graham, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Carl Westerfeld, and Sullivan & Sullivan, and Theo. J. Roche, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

J. Alexander Yoell died in July, 1904. In 1909 his widow, Emily C. Yoell, petitioned for a family allowance. Her petition was opposed by the special administratrix, but the court, after hearing, awarded a family allowance in the sum of one hundred dollars a month, dating from the death of the husband. From this order the appeal under consideration is taken.

As ground of opposition the special administratrix set up a post-nuptial agreement between the deceased and his wife, with appropriate averments, to the effect that it had been faithfully carried out according to its tenor and terms by the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Moore v. CoppCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. In re the Estate of GarcelonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Burris v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Johnston v. . SpicerNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  5. Lauricella v. LauricellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Landers v. WhitneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Estate of BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Estate of McNuttCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Estate of BoesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API