Legal Opinion
Thacker v. American Foundry
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 11, 1947No. Civ. 15280PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KINCAID, J. pro tern.
Defendants herein appeal from a judgment in plaintiff’s favor in the sum of $4,800 in an action seeking damages for breach of a contract of employment.
The first question presented for decision is, assuming that the parties entered into a contract upon the terms al leged in the complaint and found by the trial court, was such contract illegal and void as violative of the Salary Stabilization Act of 1942, in that the compensation therein provided to be paid plaintiff by the defendants was not approved by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue of the United States. The answer…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Speegle v. Board of Fire UnderwritersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Estate of YoellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Todd v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Boehm v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Teachout v. BogyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Pittman v. Larson Distributing Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1986
- J. C. Millett Co. v. Park & Tilford Distillers Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1954
- Hunt Foods, Inc., a Corporation v. Wellington Phillips and H. W. LiholmCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Fibreboard Products, Inc. v. TownsendCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Ravel v. HubbardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.