Legal Opinion

State v. Kimrey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 15, 1952No. 217PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

Tbe defendant assigns as error the way and manner in which, the trial judge interrogated his witnesses. He contends that the judge extended and elaborated on the solicitor’s cross-examination of the witnesses in a manner calculated to discredit and impeach them and cast doubt upon their testimony before the jury.

The rule is firmly fixed with us that “no judge at any time during the trial of a cause is permitted to cast doubt upon the testimony of a witness or to impeach his credibility.” S. v. Simpson, 233 N.C. 438, 441, 64 S.E. 2d 568; G.S. 1-180, as rewritten, Chapter 107, Session Laws of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. State v. . BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. State v. . OwenbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. State v. CantrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. KirbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. DeesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. TinsleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. FurleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API