Legal Opinion

State v. Cantrell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1949PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

The defendant entered a plea of not guilty to the charge in the bill of indictment, and undertook to prove an alibi. He offered a witness in his behalf not only for the purpose of establishing his alibi, but also to testify to a conversation which the witness claimed to have had with the prosecutrix sometime prior to the trial, which conversation tended to exonerate the. defendant. Whereupon, the court took over the examination of the witness and asked him the following questions :

“Q. When did you talk to her ? A. I talked with her on Saturday, two weeks before the last court.
“Q. Where was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Withers v. . LaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. State v. . DickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1864
  3. State v. . OwnbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  4. State v. . OwenbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. Morris v. Kramer Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. HankersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. State v. CanipeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. State v. McEachernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API