Legal Opinion

State v. Dees

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 29, 1972No. 7211SC127PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant’s first contention is that the trial court erred in asking certain questions of the defendant. The exact language complained of reads as follows:

Witness: Your Honor, may I say one word?

Court: I don’t know what you want to say, I will let you start. Go ahead.

Witness: Your Honor, I think they should have fingerprinted him too. They fingerprinted me. If they got any fingerprinting on me it was off the box but I have been to Strickland Motor Company looking a job and they did not fingerprint him I don’t think so. I won’t say yes and I won’t say no.

Court: You had been…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. State v. ByrdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. KimreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. State v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  5. State v. SummersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  2. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. State v. StaffordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. DowningCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API